JUDICIAL REVIEW: BENEFITS OVERVIEW
The usage of ‘Judicial Review’ may be a mighty tool when handled properly – so what precisely is it and is it helpful?
What is ‘Judicial Review’?
‘Judicial review’ is a kind of court proceeding that can eventually save a case if victorious. By way of Judicial review, a judge will analyse a case verdict in respect of its fairness, rather than whether the conclusion made was correct or incorrect in itself.
By doing so, the judge will eventually determine whether the precise methods were obeyed when the verdict was made, as a way of concluding the fairness of the conclusion. From this, the same conclusion shall be forced again by a public body, as long as it is resolved so in a legal manner.
As a result, any case that are claimed to be ‘incorrect’ in their conclusive evaluation may not pursue judicial review as a cure, as the concept of rightness is eliminated from the reexamining of the case, in support of what is legal.
What conclusions are expected to exercise ‘Judicial Review’?
- Judgements concerning local establishments; explicitly concerning welfare benefits and education.
- Judgements of Immigration Authorities
- Judgements of Regulatory Bodies
- Judgements concerning a prisoners Rights.
What can the court of law do with the power for ‘Judicial Review’?
Any court with the right for judicial review will have the authority to overturn the following, if any activities are uncovered mismatched with a higher authority:
- Overturn laws
- Overturn governmental acts
- Overturn executive rulings